Every time I post crucial, time-sensitive, treatment-specific questions directly to the author of this thread, another cycle of the same theory-bashing posts and charts pop up like weeds. And the argument goes in circles, over and over. People have picked their sides, and those that are interested in this treatment would like some answers. Is it too much to ask to not continually clutter up the discussion? As such, I won’t even bother with the pretense of changing my initial question, now buried pages back:
[Size=4]I feel like the most important questions are being drowned out because of the endless bickering. For some reason, people trying this new therapy are being held to a MUCH HIGHER standard than any other treatment. Instead of appreciating the fact that some people have taken initiative to explore this treatment, we are crucifying them for not reporting miraculous results for a therapy which by all accounts from the literature out there makes you suffer terrible regressions (you’re allowing an infection to re-permeate your system!). Please people, suspend judgment a little, offer more support, and perhaps the guys will be more inclined to share their insight and ordeal more. I imagine Solon is disillusioned with the mob mentality on this website, when all he was trying to do was share “Prostatitis treatment as a novel insight into Finasteride related problems.” Each one of us can connect dots all we want on paper, but to me, ACTUAL RESULTS FROM TREATMENT MATTER MORE! YOU CAN AND SHOULD ONLY CONNECT DOTS IN THIS REVERSE ORDER. AS IN: “THIS TREATMENT WORKED” SO LET’S REVERSE-ENGINEER OUR THEORIES. So I’ll re-post in hopes that this is noticed by Solon (can we try to wait for his response rather than contributing personal attacks and repetitive reiterations of theories ALREADY EXPRESSED A MILLION TIMES ON THIS THREAD AND OTHERS??:[/size]
[Size=4]Solon, I think what confuses most people is that they don’t truly understand what your “before” and “after” erections are like. And I think this is what MOST concerns MOST of us on this board. Perhaps, you can clarify this in no uncertain terms? What was your sex life BEFORE treatment? And what is it like NOW?[/size]
We’re all wondering—“Can I get my arousal from fantasy, porn, and WOMEN back—by treating CP with Dr. Georgiadis?”
Most of us have limp dicks in romantic moments. Most of us require Cialis, Viagra, Levitra, penile injections, or a cocktail of herbs and supplements to prop ourselves up to a semi-usable erection.
Will this treatment result in erections in all likelihood (barring exceptional cases and complications)?
I THINK you’re saying yes. I THINK you’re saying that you used to have erectile dysfunction, and now you’re having great sex (without Cialis, etc.). And that you are upset because you were hoping your testicles would improve in size. My guess is that most of us cannot even fathom the degree of testicular atrophy that you must have experienced (something like a steroid-abusing baseball player?), and therefore it’s hard for us to understand how this would be more important than getting ERECTIONS. I do have sympathy for you here, as it clearly bothers you. I have experienced some testicular shrinkage, but for me erections are the MAIN thing.
[Size=4]
Lastly, it is a little ambiguous how to plan for this treatment, because it appears it can take longer than expected, and follow-up visits do not seem uncommon.[/size]
Which is the best possible plan (assuming one has flexibility)?
• Is it best to allow for, say, about 2 months with the doctor? To do as many consecutive massages as possible?
• Is it better to get treated for about a month, go home, see how things improve, then follow-up as necessary?
If you could PLEASE try to respond line-for-line with precision, and as little ambiguity as possible, I think it would go a long way to clearing things up for people. Yes, I realize that every individual case is different, and so on. But GENERALLY speaking, in your best ESTIMATION, is the reality that people may need to get a one-way flight ticket and prepare for the possibility of an extended initial stay? Is the likelihood high that people would need to return a few months later for some follow-up therapies? This is kind of the “word on the street.”
I know you’ve been through HELL, and a LOT of scrutiny, so I thank you for continuing to come back and stand up for the cause and explain stuff. Again, if you could clear up the above questions, you may not have to keep re-posting. Sure, there are those who just don’t see eye-to-eye with you, but I ASSURE YOU, THERE ARE MANY MORE THAT ARE WATCHING EVERY WORD YOU POST AND APPRECIATE YOUR REPORTS BACK AND YOUR INTRODUCTION OF THIS THEORY AND TREATMENT. SO THANK YOU!