So did they come up with the idea that you may be copper excess or did you suggest it to them and now they are trying to find it?
I find it absurd that they would want to do a liver biopsy to diagnose hidden copper toxicity. That is a very dangerous call as the risk of a bleed in liver biopsy is very high in comparison to other surgery.
Ususally they dont just test, they give an interpretation of what it all means and how to treat it. Who did you go through for the test? Was it ARL or someon else?
I would now find someone who is good at interpreting them. Perhaps call them back and ask who to contact or ring ARL and ask them to interpret it perhaps for a fee? You could also try and get in contact with Letsconveiniences naturapath.
This is a big ask, but could you list all of the abnormalities that match up with copper toxicity to the ones listed in Letsconveineinces thread regarding hair miner results?
These ones:
Ø Most slow oxidizers and all very slow oxidizers.
Ø Calcium level greater than about 70 mg%.
Ø Magnesium greater than about 10 mg%.
Ø Potassium level less than about 4 mg%.
Ø Zinc less than about 13 mg%.
Ø Zinc greater than about 20 mg% is often, but not always is a hidden copper indicator.
Ø Mercury level greater than 0.03 mg%. (see below)
Ø Slow oxidation with a copper level less than 1.0 mg%
Ø Copper greater than about 2.5 mg% on any chart indicates excess and usually biounavailability.
Ø Calcium /potassium ratio greater than 10:1.
Ø Sodium/potassium ratio less than about 2:1.
Ø Phosphorus less than about 12 mg%. This is a newer indicator with less research behind it.
Ø Four low electrolytes.
Ø Four high electrolytes.
Ø Sympathetic dominance pattern.
Ø Calcium shell.
Ø Step down pattern.
Ø Step up pattern.
Ø Double low ratio pattern.
Ø Bowl pattern.
Ø Passive-aggressive pattern.