Where is the Harvard Baylor study?

[Wings]

It was released last month but I can’t find it anywhere. Can someone link it to me please? Thank you.

[Dubya_B]

Harvard (Brigham Women’s Hospital) and Baylor are two separate studies.

The BWH study found normal hormone levels in the blood of PFS patients, fMRI results that are consistent with what they call “psychogenic ED”, took biopsies from tissue (back skin) that isn’t necessarily affected by PFS, and didn’t bother to report in the article which genes were differentially expressed in the biopsies from PFS patients.

The following post contains discussion and a link to Part 1 of the Baylor study:

Baylor study, part 1 - Penile vascular abnormalities in young men with persistent side effects after finasteride use for the treatment of androgenic alopecia. 2020

Penile vascular abnormalities in young men with persistent side effects after finasteride use for the treatment of androgenic alopecia Mohit Khera et al, 2020 Background: The constellation of persistent sexual, neurological, and physical adverse effects in patients who discontinue 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) has garnered recent concern. The objective of this study was to evaluate potential penile vascular changes and persistent adverse effects of 5ARIs in men treated for androgenic alopeci…

Part 2 is still pending…

[lakehouse]

the rumor got “Corrected” to November as the deadline month

[orthogs]

And then it seemed that they were still working on the epigenetics interpretation and outsourced it to the University of Utah.

[lakehouse]

That information was out of context

Doesn’t tell us when that was outsourced and when it ends

[BibFortuna]

Do you know where I might be able to find more info about that?

[orthogs]

No, I don’t.

[Cooper]

I just hope that the part 2 would be something long and benefical. Because we already knew the things in the part 1. I hope part 2 would deliver the real deal.

[Trazohell]

I thought september was deadline???

[Dubya_B]

That turned out to be just a rumor started by someone who later apologized for misinterpreting emails from the PFSF and Dr. Khera.

A clarification on my correspondence from Dr Mohit Khera (Baylor)

Good evening forum. I recently published the news that Baylor will be published in September. But I made a mistake and misled you. Here is what Dr Khera wrote to me “Thank you for the inquiry. Yes, we suspect the second portion of the study will be published within the next 6 months” (A moderator has seen evidence of the email) That answer was sent on May 4 and if we add another 6 months, it means he estimates it would be released by November. Sorry for misleading you. It won’t happen again. …

A clarification on my correspondence from Dr Mohit Khera (Baylor)

Here’s the response straight from Khera…Its not completed… “Still working on it and in collaboration with the University of Utah and their genetic department to analyze and interpret the data.” Mohit Khera, MD

I think many of us have moved beyond keeping our fingers crossed to the point of believing it will be published only after/if it is published, regardless of what is said concerning the study.