You aren’t really listening and very clearly haven’t done the reading yourself. Go read the materials and you are free to PM me but please don’t drag this on. You don’t have the slightest idea how the legal issues unfolded and I have explained them to you but you have chosen not to acknowledge them or you just don’t understand. But one final time before I stop engaging you:
There were conclusive data points from the clinical trials that Merck intentionally excluded from the warning label. The cases simply did not run into trouble because of lack of proof of fraud, it was their difficulty and neglect of the scientific component.