Wrong. Only by following the facts can we find an answer. Constructing a false narrative may be comforting, but in no way will it help find a way out of this problem. If we look at the evidence it does seem ‘PFS’ is very rare - but so what if it is? Its still real. And actually known rare side effects of enzyme inhibitors may better match the timeline of PFS, for example: hopkinsmedicine.org/news/med … tudy_finds
After Mew made people put a reason before signing up, it turns out about 30% of members don’t have sides. And currently most regular posters have nothing wrong with them. In my opinion. I don’t know why these people post, but it does call into question how many real people there can actually be.
You contradict yourself - viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6657&p=57114#p57114
I agree with the evidence. Dr Irwig has said the numbers affected are 1-1000. Are you disagreeing with him? Do you have evidence that contradicts what I have said about the numbers or % effected? If not you need to apologise to me.