Is Merck's NuvaRing Killing Thousands, Asks Vanity Fair...

The January 2014 edition of Vanity Fair features a major report on the alleged dangers of Merck’s NuvaRing. The story, headlined “Is the Contraceptive NuvaRing Killing Thousands?” begins:

“When 24-year-old Erika Langhart—talented, beautiful, bound for law school—died on Thanksgiving Day 2011, she became one of thousands of suspected victims of the birth-control device NuvaRing. Elite army athlete Megan Henry, who survived rampant blood clots in her 20s, is another. With major suits against NuvaRing’s manufacturer, Merck, headed for trial, Marie Brenner asks why, despite evidence of serious risk, a potentially lethal contraceptive remains on the market.”

Later on comes this passage:

"In the initial response to my e-mails and phone calls requesting an interview with Merck chairman Ken Frazier or one of the company lawyers, a pleasant Merck employee named Lainie Keller asked how the company could be helpful. When I explained that I was focusing only on NuvaRing, she said she understood magazine deadlines and would get back to me soon. Two days later, I received an e-mail from her. ‘Ken Frazier and our other colleagues are not available to participate in this opportunity,’ she wrote, and she directed me to several Web sites, including ACOG’s and Merck’s, ‘to help provide perspective.’ At the end of the e-mail, Keller included Merck’s official statement: ‘Blood clots have long been known as a risk associated with combined hormonal contraceptives. The FDA-approved patient information and physician package labeling for NuvaRing include this information. . . . We remain confident in the safety and efficacy profile of NuvaRing—which is supported by extensive scientific research—and we will continue to always act in the best interest of patients.’

The full story here:

vanityfair.com/politics/2014 … tive-trial

Lainie Keller sure chooses her words carefully now, doesn’t she?

SA…I thought the same thing.

I just reread the entire Vanity Fair article and it’s eerily similar to the case of finasteride.

So I would recommend that everyone read it asap as well:

vanityfair.com/online/daily/ … estigation

Eventually, Merck is going to become so reviled that it will have a hard time selling anything to anyone.

No matter how smooth a criminal, no matter how Teflon a Don, in the end, justice always prevails.

Great article PR123, thanks for posting.

It’s important to comment on the VF article as well, to (a) show your support for such courageous reporting and (b) note the parallels to finasteride.

Odd – I just noticed that the link to the VF NuvaRing story is not working:

vanityfair.com/politics/2014 … tive-trial

I hope it wasn’t taken down – or hacked.

Working for me…

Meanwhile, Merck issues a recall of its increasingly controversial Gardasil.

The story here:

foxnews.com/health/2013/12/2 … l-vaccine/

(On the Friday, before Christmas, of course – when no one is paying attention.)

WOW! Pulling Gardasil means they are THAT much more liable in court for that poison…this company won’t be in business in 10 years.

Oh yes they will !!!

They will still be on the go long after we die, FACT.

Money talks and they have it in abundance.

Merck are here to stay unfortunately.

I think they will continue to stay in business even with all the lawsuits against the tobacco companies they were not closed down. It seems that Merck is one of those compaines that is “too big to fail”.

No company is too big to fail.

Particularly not Merck.

Mark my words.

This just in from Reuters:

“Merck to Pay $100 mln in NuvaRing Contraceptive Settlement”

At about 3,800 eligible suits, that’s about $260,000 per victim.

The deal must be accepted by 95% of those victims.

Sounds like Merck does in fact want all such litigation of its books. So we can assume they will offer to buy out Propecia cases as well – though at a similar pittance.

The full story here:

cnbc.com/id/101399158

but…bloody hell, how many dangerous medications has this company made so far?!

finasteride
vioxx
nuvaring
Gardasil

accutane was it also theirs?

That’ only $26,000 per plaintiff, similar to Fosamax. Another slap in the face.

This is very interesting. Usually the drug company will wait until a few “bellweather” cases are tried before making a settlement offer. This is different…seems like a preemptive offer. I am not sure if I am reading this correctly, but offering a settlement before the bell weather cases are tried seems like a desperate move. I hope that the plaintiffs don’t accept this shitty offer…take them to court.

I agree 100%, Jorbie.

I am hoping that the plaintiffs pull a Michael Corleone on Kenneth Frazier and tell him, "Here’s OUR offer, Mr. Frazier:

“We’ll litigate against you for the next hundred years if need be. And even when we take every penny in Merck’s coffers, we expect you – personally – to wait on us hand and foot the rest of your days, laboring 24/7 to make right the horrors that your company’s ‘safe and effective’ product has inflicted on us.”

Why no one in the media or the federal government is lifting a finger to put an end to Merck’s evil ways is beyond me.

They have also killed a lot of people with their AID$ drugs.

It is now widely acknowledged that AZT killed a lot of people in the 1980s.

The reason you dont see people with full blown AID$ anymore is not because of antiviral drugs but because they dont give AIDS patients high doses of AZT which destroys their DNA.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zidovudine

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duesberg_hypothesis

this just makes me feel so angry and powerless at the same time