i noticed some of you guys are jumping into supplementing your different mutations, but if you guys have CBS mutation (which I read something like 90% of people with these problems have), is you need to address the CBS mutation first or else others wonāt work right. CBS mutation has a lot to do with what is going on with us IMO⦠FUCK PFSā¦
@droit, the supplement you posted from YASKO, the NHF multi vitamin contains milk thistle in it. i was about to buy it until i saw this. my thinking right now is that an optimized thyroid/adrenal function will allow us to handle these type of supplements that other people crashed on, but i really donāt want to risk it. iām going to stick with a whole food multi right now.
Not sure if this has been posted here, but this is basically a cliff notes from YASKOās book:
Really difficult part of optimizing CBS mutation is the diet⦠you canāt have animal protein. Found a post on phoniexrising where someone had success with this diet, a little less restrictive⦠but still really, really restrictive⦠livingnetwork.co.za/chelatio ⦠food-list/
SNP is a DNA sequence. CBS is a SNP that 90% of individuals have a mutation on if they have methylation problems. I see⦠is it only 23andme you canāt take? There is another DNA test you can take besides 23andme⦠I foget the name of it though. Might be available in your area.
What is the reasoning behind your supplementing of NAC?
In other news, I have a theory for what is happening. I think our bodies cannot properly utilize sulfur due to PFS fucking up our methylation cycle. How it did it, I have no idea, but I see pretty clear patterns.
I think the main problem lies here⦠our bodies do not make this:
If you notice, I underlined that gas is produced by the enzyme cystathionine beta-synthase⦠aka the CBS gene. 90% of people with methylation problems have the CBS mutation. This is a pretty direct correlation between CBS + something acting on erectile dysfunction.
SNP is āsingle nucleotide polymorphism.ā It is just a site in a gene that may be mutated. For the enzymes in the methylation cycle, there are some well researched SNPs, so it is well documented whether they slow down or speed things up. Depending on how how many more mutations you have, youāre more predisposed to methylation cycle issues. Some are more severe than others.
In no particular order: 1) The methylation cycle has enzymes that shuttle raw materials around to eventually make SAMe. SAMe goes out and methylates something, and the byproduct; SAH, which is converted to homocystiene, is shuttled back around to make SAMe.
However, once SAMe donates its methyl group to something with biological meaning, SAH is converted to homocysteine, which can either go back around, or 2) it can go down the transulfuration pathway to glutathione. CBS is the enzyme that will send homocyteine down the transulfuration pathway.
Typically mutations in the enzymes in the methylation cycle will slow things down. For example, mutations in the MTHFR enzyme (the thing that converts folates into the active form), will weaken your ability to create methyl-folate by something like 60% if you have 2 mutations at a SNP.
However, mutations in CBS make it over efficient, thus draining things out of the methylation cycle. Which is bad because you want to perpetuate the methylation cycle and create glutathione in balance.
Iāve seen four 23andMe methylation outputs, and got a summary from a 5th. The results are in the format moonman1 posted here:
I would really like more data so please send me a note if youāve done 23andMe.
All five do have CBS mutations. 3 have homozygous mutations, but Iām the only one that is homozygous for the really bad one (C699T). The interesting thing I see in the other 4 is that they have lots BHMT mutations, but we donāt have enough data to say there is a statistical enrichment.
1 guy has homozygous mutations in all three snps
1 guy has homozygous mutations in two snps, and is heterozygous for the other one
1 guy has heterozygous mutations in all three snps
1 guy has one homozygous mutation, the rest are normal
I was a user for 7 years without problems. The other guys were very short term users. So if we can get more data a pattern with some statistical significance may emerge.
The BHMT mutations are not as well researched as CBS so I canāt really say what this would mean if there was a significant pattern. Most anecdotal forums say that BHMT has the same effect as CBS.
Glad youāre taking the test, Mario. Iām awaiting results, myself.
My erections are as hard as my cialis days. I am waking up after 6 hours sleep, practically, unable to sleep longer⦠But, I feel great, physically and mentally. Better than I would at 8 or 9 hrs sleep.
how long have you been taking NAC for? ineresting on those co factors you are doing⦠what worries me is i found out NAC contains high amounts of sulfur in it. it could be your other pathways are working because i saw you were supplementing witha few other things for methylation.
i would just get the test and then wait for the results and then go from there.
Its great to hear weāll get another data point. bluejaysfan will be number 6 and you will be 7. The 23andMe experience is great otherwise. I have learned a lot about myself.
Also, make sure to report your Homocysteine levels.
To test whether or not you have a methylation block, the hallmark test is the āMethylation Pathways Panelā from Vitamin Diagnostics.
Youāve previously said that your country doesnāt have access to this test, so the next best thing would be an oxidative stress stress. One example is the 8-Hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine test in the Organix test by Metametrix.
Youāve been going pretty hard on the methylation protocol, so if you were able to get either test, I donāt think it would be as severe as from before you started. It still may be helpful to see where youāre at.
Thanks for replying Mario. The reason I was asking was that my own IGF1 levels were tested when I was referred to an endo regarding my own concerns. Although I was told that everything was fine I still feel that an IGF1 level of 135 ug/L (65-350) is low and Iāve noted others on propeciahelp with low IGF1.
I think you guys mentioned folate as part of the things you are discussing? I just got my bloodwork back and my folate was REALLY low. The doctor said that folate was very important for DNA repair or function or whatever. Just thought Iād mention it.
A year ago, before I heard the Chris Kresser podcast posted in the beginning of this thread, I took a SpectraCell vitamin test. SpectraCell is more functional in that they look at how your cells do in the absence of each vitamin they are testing for, instead of measuring blood concentrations.
I was also severely low on Folate (low on all the B-vitamins). And I didnāt know what that meant until I heard Chris Kresserās podcast.
For those of you who have had normal folate or B12 on a typical serum test, that doesnāt necessarily mean youāre not in the state weāre talking about here. As Chris Kresser says in that podcast, serum tests are usually for the inactive forms.
If you decide to supplement folate, take a look at active folate in the form we discuss here. The school of though we are investigating in this thread is that āfolic acid,ā which is typically found in supplements, is not nearly as good as methyl-folate. In fact some say āfolic acidā is bad. You can see the MTHFR lecture I posted earlier (viewtopic.php?f=27&t=7178&start=80#p71743).
If you get interested in full protocol or testing in this area, please let me know if you have any questions.
Homocysteine within normal levels although somewhat on the upper scale. Unfortunately i did not have homocysteine levels tested prior starting NAC + Methylation cycle supplements.
I will re-test in 30 days for Free T and Homocysteine
im sure droit can chime in to some of your other quesitons as iām not 100% sure. but regarding your first quesiton on NAC, i was actually just reading thisā¦
Basically, if you have these problems, thereās a 90% chance you have the CBS mutation. If that is the case, NAC will do more harm than good because of the high sulfur content found in it. CBS means we canāt utilize sulfur properly, thus glutathione is not being made properly and too much sulfur circulating in blood, leading to many issuesā¦
regarding you feeling crappy⦠ivāe read through taht site above many times⦠and itās pretty clear you need to treat the high sulfur issues first if you have that mutation (which 90% of people have if they have methylation issues), so i would start there⦠but check what your results are.
yo, getting interested in this (newbie in this) but i think i shouldnāt go about without any prior knowledge on what mutations I have. do you know if there is any comprehensive test for all possible mutations there are? who does this, any links to it etc?
iām hesitating as well cos jarrowās formula was changed and i still donāt know which are the best brands to use for methyl and adenocobā¦
EDIT dunno why but serum B12-vitamin is way over upper limit despite not supplementing so if iām any judge, all kinds of (probably inactive) b12 is pooling up in my blood for some reasonā¦
I am always hesitant to strongly advocate for someone supplement in a certain way because it is like playing with fire. Weāve seen different flavors of this plan work for different people. And that is consistent with the diversity in other communities. So Iāll just comment based on what Iāve read and my interpretations. Please consider your personal history and what has worked for you.
It is possible to back up chemical reactions with too much end product, depending on how the enzymes are regulated.
But from what you describe, I donāt know if thatās your situation. If you had a lot of glutathione, that would be good and it would be more persistent that the quick ups and downs youāve had. Unless you have some form of oxidative stress in your life.
If you were backing up the transulfuration pathway (the direction toward glutathione) with NAC, I would expect methylation to keep cycling. If donāt have the CBS mutations that would draing your methylation cycle into the transulfuration pathway, you may have to take the CBS cofactors (B6) to push the metabolites of the methylation cycle into the transulfuration pathway toward glutathione. But we would need genetic data and the methyaltion pathway panel to see where things are at.
I have an MTHFR mutation and will happily drop a little methyl-folate once a week or so after I get out of this.
If you do find that you do have MTHFR mutations, you have to ask yourself if you liked how you felt before all this. If do have a methylation block now, and are able to get out of it, its completely possible that without a stab of oxidative stress, youād be fine without it.
In the Dr. Van Konynenburg lecture he said that the patients that responded, got off the supplements and just took antioxidants from time to time.
This is all based on the assumption that youāre currently in a methylation block, and before fin you were not. And that a methylation block is the source of all of your problems. But only testing would tell us there.
There is a such thing as over driving the methylation cycle. I know Iām certainly not in that position.
But its been suggested that Niacin is a good treatment for over methylators, since niacin will eat up methyl groups during its metabolism.
Now, niacin is needed as co factor for a lot of things so I take a normal dose of niacin in my B-complex.
But in my case I donāt take too much because it will āmop upā methyl groups and I know from testing that my SAMe is low.
Remember that there are two paths in the methylation cycle, around the circle, and down toward glutathione. One of the interpretations from Dr. Van Konynenburg is that if you stimulate the circle too aggressively then little will be able to go down the transulfuration pathway toward glutathione.
In my case, I have the CBS mutation that up regulates the drain to the transulfuration pathway. So I probably would have a hard time beating transulfuration pathway.
I take hydroxocobalamin. I have found first hand and from my genomics that I donāt do good with excessive methyl groups. I feel best on hydroxocobalamin.
But that is not everyoneās experience. Some start on hydroxo-B12, and donāt notice a change until they get on methyl-B12.
Dr. Van Konynenburg actually suggested that hydroxo-B12 might not be enough, and was switching over to methyl-B12 for his āsimple methylation protocol.ā
In the end the constant message is to titrate up with your protocol.
Is this true? It seems like you have been doing great. And youāve been on the methylation protocol for a long time now.
The thing we need to understand is why is NAC making you feel so good and why so quickly. Going off of my tests, glutathione shouldnāt be generating at that rate and to the magnitude that you feel recovered.
I made a very small improvement in my glutathione in four months, and the biochemist at the last that was great.
Once you generate glutathione, its a little more persistent than the effect youāre describing of a quick downturn. All the lectures on this subject say when you have healthily glutathione, the cellular environment is ripe to perpetuate the methylation cycle and continue generating glutathione as needed. Assuming you donāt have a stress that overcomes your capacity to generate glutathione.
I wonder if youāre just getting the direct antioxidant effect from NAC. You could test this by taking another antioxidant like some Vitamin E or C to see if you feel better.
To further complicate things: the people on phoenixrising has said that glutathione precursors (like NAC) make them feel worst. The theory (this is unsubstantiated by any publication) is that the NAC is conjugating the B12 and removing it from the system.
For completeness, one possibility is that you are an over methylator and the NAC is tuning it down. But again, without testing, no one can be sure and the above is just a theory. Trying to supplement to bring down methylation would be an aggressive change and you should really think before doing something like that.
But make sure any changes you make you feel comfortable with.
I would say that to you any one reading. You really want to get tested for the methylation parameters (SAMe and reduced glutathione). That methylation panel I described is of course the most reportable.
The 2 real Methylation Panels, the 2 other high oxidative stress results and the 5 genetic data points all suggest we would be in a methylation block, low glutathione stage, but without testing youāre just in the dark which will lead to haphazard supplementing.
I understand its quicker and cheaper to just try the supplements. But as a community we should be aggregating tests and finding patterns.
Thereās been one or two people who have posted that didnāt like the way they felt when trying this protocol. If they were able to get some testing, then they could verify what state they were in and dedicate the time to getting out of it.