only hope is melcangi imo
Itâs been suggested that an executive for Merck interfered with data in order to get Fin approved. We are clearly dealing with a suspect medication that has proven to cause serious symptoms. I trust Awor knew what he was doing when he designed the study. Therefore how could the study not find anything, that doesnât make sense given Fins background. 20,000 something genes studied how could that not reveal an issue.
If original research data was corrupted then itâs entirely plausible that Baylorâs data has also been corrupted.
I doubt Khera would have the time to do this if heâs busy with other research. Changing data may also be against his own principles. Why would Baylor risk their reputation falsifying data for Merck, so Iâd expect this to be carried by another party.
The level of debate over this study clearly shows that something doesnât seem right. Regardless of the opinions I trust that human behaviour is a good indicator of positivity and negativity.
3 Likes
Remember Merck had a âhit listâ of Doctors they wanted to silence who were speaking out against Vioxx.
Itâs not beyond the realms of possibility that Merck are also trying to âneutraliseâ Doctors who are investigating Finasteride.
5 Likes
Iâd say forget about Baylor and we replicate the same study elsewhere where Merck has no ties to, Baylor is a joke at this point, maybe if we can get a fundraiser going for the same study from some private scientists we will get our answers. We should avoid any Universities and do a background check on the scientists we get to make sure there is no goofy business going on.
3 Likes
We cant just ignore the fact that over a year before publication some members on this forum took it upon themselves to declare that due to their connections they knew something more significant had been found. Usually this goes hand in hand with the implication that they already know whats going on and that the silly members should just follow their lead.
Fact is: Nobody on this forum has a clue what is going with Baylor or what PFS is. The same people who claimed or implied possessing special knowledge also denied that the study will be published in two parts, a fact that has now been confirmed by the foundation.
Lets get real here. Lets not delude ourselves by stating that some members have some real clue what PFS is. Nobody knows shit. Anybody implying anything else is blowing smoke up their own behind.
When you guys say that Merck has doctored with the results you imply that PFS should be easy to understand and solve. How on earth do you come to that conclusion?
There are many diseases where a lot more funding is involved, where the causal mechanisms have not been uncovered. PFS research receives basically no funding yet you are surprised that we have no answers.
Let the following sink in: Some forum members have exaggerated their understanding of PFS. In all likelihood PFS is highly complex and the biology involved not understood. Therefore it should be EXPECTED that a small community does not have the resources to uncover the mechanisms involved.
I increasingly get the feeling that the quick jump to the âMerck doctored with the resultsâ conclusion is a coping mechanism as it comes with the assumption that results should already be forthcoming without that doctoring. A very illogical and naive assumption.
3 Likes
Everyday that goes by Dr. Mohit loses more credibility. He has received monies in the past from big pharma including Merck.
1 Like
@ll_amp_Prosper, your slanderous comment was removed. Unless you have evidence of what you day, donât post accusational comments here.
2 Likes
Fill out the survey.
1 Like
I think we should consider closing this thread.
Many of the posts on here involve speculation about things people donât know anything about. Theyâre rightfully upset about the situation we have found ourselves in which has led to this thread devolving into a cesspool of conspiracy theories. There are some half-truths in here but theyâve lead to many false conclusions.
Realistically, you shouldnât expect a cure or huge breakthrough from this study. I think the best case scenario is that he adds more supporting evidence to PFS and maybe finds some additional biological clues. The fact that it has taken a long time to publish does not mean that much and is not that uncommon. But it is annoying. Hang in there. The Khera study is not the only thing our community has going for it right now.
2 Likes
There is plenty of evidence online of Dr. Mohit receiving payments from Merck for âconsultingâ work
2 Likes
Dr. Mohit Khera did do promotional speaking for Merck. It was related to the med Fosomax, a med made by Merck. If u look here at his payments u can see this when u go to 2013. Also u can see he got 31000 in payments for Fosomax related things, the third highest in his payment list: https://projects.propublica.org/docdollars/doctors/print/121652
Also look at this study, and look at the ââ COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTSââ. Dr Mohit Kera is mentioned because of being a consultant for Merck. So they literally mention him for this competing interests. Wow. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577595/
3 Likes
Wow!!!
Fosamax, coincidentally, is a drug that also destroys lives. Merck has denied and is trying to hide its catastrophic and lethal side effects.
This is quite informative and explains a lot.
4 Likes
What are the odds that literally this guy, recieving money from Merck, is leading the PFS research. And by coincidence, itâs also constantly, taking a longer and longer time to release. And o yeah, in 2 parts. I am sorry, and donât want to be negative, but itâs hard for me to unsee what is happening here.
3 Likes
Why did they get a urologist (Kheara) to do a âgeneticâ study on PFS??
1 Like
A friend of mine, who is a scientist, just told me this:
âIf I get a grant and donât publish within 1-2 years of getting it, thatâs a failure.â
2 Likes
If itâs currently in peer review stage obviously a wider cohort of scientists have already read it.
1 Like
Arenât the people running the PFS foundation Doctors ?
They must know how corrupt the medical system is.
Why would doctering results take so many time?
What you guys are talking makes absolut no sense at all.
1 Like
Exactly. If the Merck doctored with the results theory was correct they would release it in a timely manner as to not raise suspicion.
1 Like