I think finasteride is the trigger of illness that we all have in common, with various predisposing pathophysiologies, and various sub-profiles of affected patients. While most people’s systems adjust or compensate to the hormonal upheaval caused by finasteride, some people, perhaps those already on edge because of undiagnosed conditions (hypothyroidism, or sublicincal hypothyroidism, for example–things that finasteride-prescribing doctors do not think to screen for, and the finasteride bottle does not forewarn about) get over-run by this drug and all hell breaks loose. For some, the melting point may come with the onset of increased stress/trauma/lack of sleep, etc. What could normally be handled by the system, cannot be dealt with by a system already under duress by finasteride. Those already closest to their breaking point may get hit the quickest (those who were radically affected after 1 dose, or 1 week, or 1 month). A friend of mine took finasteride for a brief time many years ago and was unaffected (as far as he could tell). Now, he is working ridiculous hours, travels extensively, does not necessarily eat well, does not sleep well…and I think that if he took finasteride in this present state, it would screw him up. It would overwhelm his system, and the degree to which it would send him spinning would determine just how deep he would fall…
I believe that there is physical damage exacted by the drug which is well documented (prostate & penile tissue), as well as immune disregulation from endocrine disruption. From there, the immune and hormonal upheaval act as a gateway to all sorts of malaise. Unless any acquired conditions, infections, deficiencies, etc. are systematically removed, and at root level…and unless physical structures are repaired, or allowed to be repaired by the removal/treatment of any impeding conditions/infections and the like, the system will be in constant upheaval. Yes, this is intentionally vague speculation, but it’s based on some very logical things: the studies we have on the physical effects of finasteride (and it’s androgen deprivation) on sexual organs, as well as the knowledge that interfering with hormones impairs immunity. What we haven’t necessarily connected completely, is just how badly finasteride upsets local immunity and inflammation in the prostate. That could very much explain the persistent malfunction of the prostate organ which yields symptoms of lowered ejaculate volume, lowered ejaculation trajectory, E.D., sensitivity issues, low DHT, low libido, urinary issues (dribbling, frequency), etc.
I’ve tried to phrase this in a broad and somewhat abstract way so as not to turn this into a chronic prostatitis debate…so that maybe people who obsess only over hormones and the symptom of altered hormones might see this problem in a different light. I’m not proposing that I know the definitive treatment answer or any of the precise chemical pathways…but rather, perhaps we should stop looking at this problem as one that needs a single unifying theory and treatment. Perhaps some people have CP, and perhaps others don’t. But we might be stuck (in our theorizing) and our ill states, because we haven’t discovered and removed whatever obstacle remains in our individual PFS pathology. It might be Plyoluria/Zinc deficiency as in JN’s case. It MIGHT be. Don’t know how his story will play out. It might be that finasteride sucked his system’s ability to compensate for an underlying condition. (This wouldn’t mean that he didn’t have “PFS” or genuine PFS, it would mean that he found and reversed whatever finasteride triggered in him). It might be that others have similar anomalies in their systems that got exacerbated or exposed through finasteride’s endocrine/immune disruption (has anybody been able to answer why Ihatepropecia702 can have full-fledged sex by taking an antifungal—but still suffers from brain fog and libido?). And yes, it might be, that a subset of us, just as a subset of the male population in general, have contracted CP as a result of finasteride’s immune depression and catastrophic action on our prostates, which would explain the sexual/urological side effects. It’s not that far-fetched.
I’ve said it before, I’ve said it again: there are probably at least a dozen different profiles of PFS patients. We have some core similarities in symptoms, but then there are subgroups and subgroups of the subgroups. Sweeping statements like “DHT comes back online” do not describe us all. We don’t all have gyno (which is explainable from high estrogen, anyway, is it not?). We don’t all have brain fog. We do all seem to have some degree of sexual difficulties, and we did take a drug that altered the tissues of an important sexual organ, an organ that if removed, damages sexual function virtually irreparably: the prostate. And many of us do have thyroid complications. Those are just two clues…
…So…perhaps we need to separate some of the types of PFS…and those who recover from some of the types of side effects…it doesn’t have to be all or nothing, black or white.