Don’t think this is the complete text but interesting nonetheless, doesn’t say what type of SARM.
jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/reprin … 3560-a.pdf
this is just a link to pay for an article… can you post it all?
Sadly not costs $$.
well, this is a bit better - though still not all of it - and it doesnt mention sexual effects at all:
Like anything, this is worth looking into.
If GTXI can get their Ostarine SARM approved for cancer, we maybe able to have doctors prescribe this to see if we can recover.
It’s a very promising drug.
I highly suggest we write a letter to GTXI and see if they would be interested in doing a experimental trial on us…What do you guys think?
I suggest having a doctor do so, not yourself.
Yes i agree…I think we should shoot for awor’s demylination theory first and see how that works…trial/error…That’s all we can do…
and you can always sample S4 if so inclined - as far as i know the effects only stay as long as your administering it however - not after you stop.
It’s demethylation, not demylination. Two completely unrelated concepts, the latter of which has nothing to do with Awor’s theory.
Ok Mew.
Just for clarity’s sake.
Don’t you Guys (Awor, Mew especially) think trying SARM is a good idea? If they give us desired results then our Receptors are not damaged and if not then yes they are damaged.
Awor what do you think?
I