I understand your point of view, don’t worry. I don’t think I know more than the scientists of course, but I didn’t find all this evidence that the prostate is not involved as a cause. I think you are relying a bit too much on assumptions of what the scientists think. This condition is complicated for scientists too and they too need to take one step at a time. I also am not aware of all this movement of institutions around the globe. Those that are moving are moving on some right tracks, but it’s not that the condition is completely defined after all. Debled (the one of the post I linked) is not the first I see stating that ED in our condition is due to the prostate. So I think you are mistaken in closing the doors to this aspect. I can suppose however that you are more experienced than me, so I might be wrong of course.
It’s not that I’m not suffering from pfs. I have many of the sides, sexual, physical and neurological(the strongest for me), but I know that some other members are messed up worse in the intensity of these sides. I still can live, pretty bad, but I can live with some will power. Mine probably is just a “milder” case. It would be somewhat fool to think that the prostate is the only answer to all my sides.
The study I read on the regrowth of the prostate is not conclusive unfortunately.