New Study Released

northwestern.edu/newscenter/ … r-men.html

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY NEWS

MEDIA CONTACT: Marla Paul at 312-503-8928 or marla-paul@northwestern.edu

FOR RELEASE: Wednesday, April 1, 2015

ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION AND LOW SEX DRIVE INADEQUATELY REPORTED IN HAIR LOSS DRUG TRIALS FOR MEN
Male baldness clinical trials did not adequately report sexual dysfunction, which may persist

First meta-analysis to look at quality of safety reporting in published reports of clinical trials of the drug finasteride for male pattern baldness
Zero of 34 clinical trials had adequate safety reporting
Available toxicity information in published reports of clinical trials is very limited, of poor quality and appears systematically biased
CHICAGO — Published reports of clinical trials provide insufficient information to adequately establish the safety of finasteride for treatment of hair loss in men, according to a new Northwestern Medicine study published April 1 in JAMA Dermatology. This study is the first meta-analysis of the quality of safety reporting in clinical trials of finasteride for treatment of male hair loss.

Finasteride blocks 5α-reductase in the scalp and male reproductive organs, inhibiting the conversion of the male hormone testosterone to its more potent form, 5α-dihydrotestosterone (5α- DHT). Men who take finasteride experience a 70 percent reduction in the amount of 5α-DHT in their blood.

Not one of the 34 published clinical trial reports provided adequate information about the severity, frequency or reversibility of sexual adverse effects. (Adequate quality of adverse event reporting requires using an explicit toxicity scale to grade adverse event severity and reported numbers and/or rates of occurrence for each specific type of adverse event per study arm.)

The published clinical trial reports did not answer the key questions doctors and patients want to know:

  1. How safe is finasteride? Specifically, what is the risk that a man taking finasteride will develop sexual dysfunction?

  2. How severe is finasteride-associated sexual dysfunction when it happens to a man?

  3. If a man gets sexual dysfunction while taking finasteride, will sexual function return to normal when the drug is stopped? What is the risk of persistent sexual dysfunction associated with taking finasteride?

Finasteride was originally developed to treat enlarged prostate (prostatic hyperplasia) in older men. Men who take the drug for male pattern hair loss are typically younger and take a dose of finasteride that is about one-fifth the dose used for prostatic hyperplasia.

“People who take or prescribe the drug assume it’s safe, but there is insufficient information to make that judgment,” said lead study author Dr. Steven Belknap, research assistant professor of dermatology and general internal medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

“Our findings raise several questions,” Belknap said. “Why do the published reports of these 34 clinical trials not provide adequate information about the severity and frequency of sexual toxicity? Was this information obtained but then not included in published articles? Or, were these clinical trials performed in a way that simply didn’t capture this essential information? And most importantly, is the risk to benefit ratio of finasteride acceptable?”

The study is a report from the RADAR (Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports) project at Northwestern’s Feinberg School. The RADAR study points to a larger problem in the way clinical trials are performed and analyzed in meta-analyses.

“Typically, there is more focus on the desirable effects of the drug being studied compared to the toxic effects,” Belknap said.

Among other key findings of the paper:

Of 5,704 men in the Northwestern Medicine clinical data repository who were treated for male pattern baldness with finasteride, only 31 percent would meet inclusion criteria for the pivotal trials referenced in the manufacturer’s “Full Prescribing Information.”

Thus, the available information from clinical trials does not apply to most of these men in Northwestern’s study population who took finasteride for male pattern baldness. For example, some men with hair loss who are taking finasteride have diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure or are taking other drugs such as diuretics or antidepressants that also increase the risk of sexual dysfunction.

Duration of drug safety evaluation was limited to one year or less for 26 of 34 trials (76 percent.) But 33 percent of men in the Northwestern clinical data repository took finasteride for more than one year.

Other Northwestern authors on the study are senior author Dr. Dennis West, Imran Aslam, Tina Kiguradze, William H. Temps, John Cashy, Dr. Robert E. Brannigan and Dr. Beatrice Nardone.

The study was funded by 5R01CA102713-04 and 1R01 CA125077-01A1 from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Additional funding was provided by the Post-Finasteride Syndrome Foundation.

NORTHWESTERN NEWS: www.northwestern.edu/newscenter/

Thanks goes to health reporter, Martha Rosenberg, who sent me an email today, informing me of this latest study!

Great, it looks like the tidal wave of consensus among the scientific community is switching to acknowledge PFS

Here is the full link
feinberg.northwestern.edu/ne … afety.html

Yeah I think only moronic or paid off medical professionals try to deny it these days.

Good to know Martha Rosenberg is up on the Northwestern study.

She’s a bulldog of a reporter that Kenneth C. Frazier does NOT want to have knocking on his front door asking tough questions.

I think the foundation should contact and thank the authors, tell them that there are thousands of patients dealing with side effects years after (the likely know) and we are hoping that some more research and money goes into this. It is good to establish the contact. Maybe that will spur them into further studies.

There will be further studies from Northwestern.

You might want to actually click on the link and read it. It tells you who funded the study. Fuck, dude.

Has this forum really got this bad?

Yes. But it was pretty bad when I got here in early 2011 anyway, guys suffering for 6 years and doing nothing to bring attention to it for the most part while more people keep getting sick. Glad a handful of us were able to change that.

msn health has also picked up the study.

msn.com/en-us/health/wellnes … ar-AAajv99

1 Like

For those to brain fogged to read the link, LOL!

The study was funded by 5R01CA102713-04 and 1R01 CA125077-01A1 from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Additional funding was provided by the Post-Finasteride Syndrome Foundation. - See more at: northwestern.edu/newscenter/ … cDClx.dpuf

Do you guys have any idea when the findings from the two major studies are likely to be released?

I heard supposedly the Harvard results are supposed to be out by the end of this year or early 2016. I also heard the Baylor study aims to have a similar projected release date for the info on their study. Also lets not forget about the Italian study going on overseas in Milan, Italy. Not sure about when those results will be published though. Guys I know for many of you this has been a long hard road of pure hell. I myself have been off propecia for over 3 years and while I’ve recovered a good amount I’m still suffering with certain things. While this has been truly horrible I think that we should all be very thankful that there are these studies going on and that hopefully this thing will finally be brought into the mainstream media and medical community so they can find a viable treatment or even a damn cure!

when the findings of this study say the median duration of erectile dysfunction was 4 years- does this imply that some ppl in the dataset got better before the 4 year mark?

No, it means that those below four years have just been suffering for a shorter period. The ED was still present in those patients.