It seems that the bald truth are running scared.
They have put out a new show defending Propecia.
Listening to show and reading between the lines its obvious they are trying to cover up PFS.
If Propecia was really that “safe” they would not need to do a whole show trying to play down its side effects.
The truth about Propecia is getting out and these guys know it. Thats why they trying to pretend PFS is caused by a “placebo” effect.
I hope this Andrew Zarian mutherfucker crashes harder then Depressedguy. Manybe these stupid fucks will learn a lesson finally.
Spencer Kobren may not even take the drug himself. He has a big bald spot on the back of his head that he uses concealer to cover up.
If he really was taking fin for so long why would he have a bald spot ?
This is a good thing in my opinion. The science is coming which will prove them wrong, so let them hang themselves with their own words.
I agree the fact that they need to keep defending Propecia speaks volumes.
Why even go to the trouble of defending a drug that is “safe” ?
Once the PFS studies come out the bald truth are going to look like complete fools.
As for Andrew Zarian, I found the lengths he went to rationalise taking the drug and reassure himself very interesting. Does he think we didn’t go through that same routine ourselves? Like he’s the first to dismiss side effects as being unlikely and to feel invincible in that regard? All I’m gonna say is it would do a lot for our cause if he gets struck down very badly. Of course Spencer will then sit back and say he warned him all along.
Somebody is tossing this guy some money from somewhere, otherwise defending a “safe” drug so vehemently makes little sense. Is there anyone on this board who actually listened to this guy prior to trying Propecia? It would be great for them to call into his show and tell him so…
I wouldn’t wish it on anybody. I think they are scared that it might get banned.
They downplay the risks of the medication, yet it now says in the medication literature that there is a risk of persistent erectile dysfunction after a person stops taking it. That is on the manufacturer’s literature. Do they not believe the manufacturer? Are they accusing Merck of lying? Are they accusing the FDA of lying? If they don’t believe what is on the literature they should be campaigning to have it revised. Why are they not doing this? Is it because they know their arguments don’t stand up? Can they confirm when they will be starting a campaign to have the literature revised, on the basis that it is false? Whatever their explanation, they need to take it up directly with Merck and the FDA.
Yeah I did. I used to be quite a big member on his forum. One of my posts on the site is the most viewed topic there (80k). I get emails from people who are concerned about side effects who’ve found my topics. I got censored on the forum so I ended up quitting a year or so ago. I might go back soon because I’m employed in the industry so my profile has grown so I’d get a bit more respect.
That is good, hard to deny a former “believer” coming down with it.