You do as you please and think as you please. These protocols that I and others before me have advocated ARE based on science, therefore they cannot be self-conflicting. The science you speak of with these studies has only begun to trickle in and has not materialized to a substantial form just yet, so you’re implying there exists some kind of conflict when none actually exist just yet if at all. If this new science conflicts with previous studies that the protocol I use is based on then you’d have an argument. But you don’t have a real argument and you just talk out of your ass sometimes in order to sound smart and informed but you don’t seem to think things through before you offer a reply. What’s exhausting is trying to reason properly with someone like you. I should have known better.
[/quote]