Merck's Tredaptive failure: stock drops...

This just in from Forbes magazine:

“Merck’s niacin-containing cholesterol drug, sold under the brand name Tredaptive in Europe but still considered experimental here in the U.S., failed to prevent heart attacks, strokes, and heart procedures in a large clinical trial, dashing any hope that the medicine would be approved. Worse, an “serious adverse event” cropped up, prompting Merck to instruct doctors in Europe not to start new patients on the drug. Merck said it plans to work with regulators around the world and the independent scientists who ran the clinical trial to decide what to do next.”

More here:

forbes.com/sites/matthewherp … rcussions/

So ironic that Merck should be doing the right thing in the wake of this failure – while they continue to deny and stonewall on Propecia.

There not going to deny there product, because it does what it’s supposed to do. It’s just stupid that it’s sold for cosmetic purposes…no wonder people are getting screwed up…gahh Pharmaceutical companys.

Looks like Merck;s stock is going to close close to 4% down today.

Perhaps there is a god after all.

Ban this fuck.

Please watch this:

cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-5 … effective/

Merck is up to its same old tricks: putting profits before the well-being of it patients.

When WILL Kenneth C. Frazier learn?

And why there’s no internal revolt at Merck is beyond me.

someone will take a stand against Kenneth Frazier, mark my words, someone will put him in his place … he is the devil and will pay royally

MRK down another 1+% today.

Merry, Christmas, Mr. Frazier.

Now let’s see how smart you is in 2013 (when shareholders get their hands on all those Vioxx documents the DOJ is holding).

Mate any fuckhead can highlight something, read the whole thing you fucktard, you act like a little kid.

You are not my mate.

REALLY… :frowning: that hurts so much.

Lol relax tough guy.

On June 1, MRK closed at 37.18, marking its 2012 low.

By Oct. 18, the stock had risen to 47.96 – a gain of more than 29% – marking its 2012 high.

As we speak, the stock is hovering around 40.8, down 9+% on the day. Its steep decline began Dec. 11, when it was trading around 45. That was the day Merck announced that its large Tredaptive study was a bust.

Which means: in the wake of the Tredaptive failure, MRK has lost about 10% of its value.

Happy New Year, Kenneth Frazier.

Now let’s look at 2013.

Yesterday, PETA announced its plan (and a very clever one it is) to force Merck’s board of directors to change their policies on abusive animal testing. That by buying $2,000 worth of MRK, which in turn – according to SEC rules – gives them the legal right to submit a resolution at the company’s next board of directors meetings calling for more humane animal-use policies.

Will be interesting to see if Merck’s board – which, under the direction of Mr. Frazier, obviously has no sympathy for thousands of men the world over suffering from post-finasteride syndrome as a result of taking Propecia – shows any mercy for non-human creatures. And if they do, think of what a slap in the face that will be for its HUMAN customers.

Later in the year, Propecia victims will have their day in court with Merck. And if Mr. Frazier uses the same playbook he whipped out in the infamous Voixx trials, the company will “fight every last” Propecia case. But if they lose the first so-called bellwether case, I predict MRK will drop to a two-year low of 29.71.

And if they lose the subsequent, say, three cases, my prediction is a ten-year low of 21.93. At that point, the media will start drawing well-deserved parallels between Merck’s Vioxx pogrom and Propecia fiasco.

Anyone care to bet against me?

If you win, I will personally send you a case of finasteride (generic version).

it will only get worse for kenneth frazier, we need to bare down on him and turn up the heat every chance we get

If it’s any consolation, what Forbes is saying here…

forbes.com/sites/johnlamatti … in-europe/

…means that if Propecia were up for FDA approval today, Merck would probably not be granted such approval. Rather, larger, longer and more heavily scrutinized patient studies would be required.

And those of course would show what we all know: that Propecia is really, really dangerous to thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of men the world over.

So that’s one positive step toward a safer pharmaceutical industry–by the FDA, that is.

If left to its own devices, Merck would no doubt sell Propecia to bouncing baby boys.

After all, newborns are bald, right?

How come Merck suspends the sale of Tredaptive…

forbes.com/sites/larryhusten … redaptive/

…but won’t even ACKNOWLEDGE there’s a problem (and a major one at that) with Propecia?

Please share you (il)logic with us, Mr. Kenneth C. Frazier.

He doesn’t read this site. Perhaps send him an email?