That’s not true. Cancer affects less than 2% of the population in some countries and peaks at about 3.8%.
There is a clear rationale behind this. Cancers share a common denominator which involves methylation and deacetylation. They suspect that similar mechanisms could be involved in our problem. Following articles summarize this common denominator between various cancer types:
I seriously don’t get this. Here we have a group of scientists from an institution specialized on cancer research, which is interested in our problem because they believe that there may be a link between their work and our problem. On the other hand we have people who clearly don’t have the expertise of these scientists and start challenging their opinion. I have a problem with this.
I’m am equally surprised that not even 20% of the people who have viewed this thread responded.