It also explains why so many of these targeted treatment methods don’t work - they just cause further flows back and forth of the particular neurosteroids. This exacerbates the changes which have already arised. it makes sense that time, and a steady flow of the relevant neurosteroid through the receptor, would be the best treatment as it would lead to no further damage.
This idea is further bolstered by finasteride’s all or nothing application - it drops dht substantially even at low dosages. This characteristic of the drug would explain why the changes hit so hard.
Even if some of you didn’t recover, the increase in symptoms a period after cessation supports my theory. The sudden surge in different neurosteroids as they come back online can have very different effects. As your body was slowly getting back online the surge caused a crash and persistent damage.
It is also possible that a number of the receptors are effected in this way. If thy all come back online at different rates, this could lead to different crash/recovery combos.
With theI talian studies saying neurosteroids were reduced, it seems logical that we aren’t all suffering from down and upregulation in the same chemical receptors.
We also must remember that not everyone who gets sides develops pfs. Perhaps pfs is a separate issue altogether from the regular on drug sides, caused by this secondary mechanism.
This would make sense given the sides developed only after cessation, with none while the drug was being taken.
Of course, this is all useless speculation, but I think it seems to fit the model pretty well.