i have heard of him, he is somewhat revolutionary and does not play by the “rules”, and still gets amazing results … you never know, we should reach out … maybe he would be interested in what the foundation has to offer
When revolutionary cancer doctor has his office on the second floor of a 3 story office building and the “insurance coordinator” (read business manager) is your primary contact, you can be sure it’s not what it appears to be.
This guy has a long history of unsatisfied patients and he’s threatened these former cancer patients (who spent about $20k on less than a month of treatment) with a lawsuit for making this website. If he was for real this wouldn’t be an issue.
awwww damnit, everything i had read so far was very positive … too good to be true i guess?
If there is anything this experience has taught me, it’s that most doctors have no idea what the fuck they’re doing, and even less care about you as a patient.
very interesting!!
That is his own video, an autoproduced video. So you cannot trust it much. I understand you have to believe in something, but the fact that the FDA and Pharma attempt to our lifes doesn’t mean there are no other charlatans around. Even if he might have saved some lifes, it doesn’t mean the reported statistics are true. It’s hard to know how the things are really going. From what I read around, you cannot build up an opinion. Interestingly, there was a researcher in Italy, in the '90, who claimed he found an effective cure for cancer. His name was Di Bella. He too, claimed his trials were subjected to sabotage from outside controlleres. That story was an earthquake in Italy. Now he’s dead, and still today people are questioning themselves if the Di Bella method was really an effective cure for cancer.
A decision is all put to whether you want to commit an act of faith or not. For myself, honestly I don’t know. It’s dramatic.
to be honest, i have only heard good things about him too … hmmmmm
It’s not necessarily that they are claiming completely the false. However, there are plenty of reasons to take their testimony with some caution. As an example, the officer was about to loose his daughter and he was desperate. I mean, I am in the science field and this pfs thing brought me nuts to the point that I in some cases have trusted some questionable alternative practices. Whilst I strongly recognize that many of them are really incredible (and fortunately some science is being collected about them), upon investigation, some are simply unproductive and some are counterproductive. But for that time my mind was prone to accept everything that promised me a benefit. And this guy probably was much more desperate than me. So his daughter might really have been cured from cancer, however what is important is the statistics about the successes of Burzinski. You know scientific fraud (like alteration of study results to gain success and funds) is not a new chapter at all. So one has to to weight the things with some good attention. Yet this story is compelling and I am prone to believe in it because in fact FDA an Phrma can really be capable of everything, especially when talking of cancer treatments, which costs are enourmous. What I meant to say, is that media content can really be misleading, so it is necessary to investigate further in this question, if one wants. I will do surely, but I need more than an autoproduced video.