Baylor study delayed again

Precisely. And I think a donation counter is not effective. We need a badge system for donators, that applies once the user has set up a monthly donation of 10 dollars as an example.

I also share the frustration that the good dr. from baylor is taking 6 years to complete a study, and I believe it shows that something is not quite right in the university research/ medical research field, however I would not let that discourage me from donating.

Social norms and social enforcement are extremely powerful psychological tools to affect behavior. I agree that a badge system will be extremely effective in increasing donations. We can have a 4 tier badge system for the following amount of monthly donations - silver ($5), gold ($10), platinum ($25), and diamond ($50). I have no idea how complicated this would be to set up though.

2 Likes

I thought people had already donated a lot of money, and the Foundation had spent it on a couple of studies which have so far yielded little, in fact one which almost said it was psychosomatic?

Seems to be quite a lot of people also getting better or recovering while adhering to the cdnuts style protocols.

1 Like

Who? Name them.

2 Likes

I think the guys threatening not to donate in these posts, are just using the foundation as a scape goat.

You guys never planned on donating, and wanted to continue with experimenting home brew.

Just say that and move on instead of pointing fingers indirectly at awor. If it wasn’t for him you guys would be desperately trying to “aCtIvAtE tHe 5aR” or some other stupid theory that ignores a whole decade of progress

@vanquish @adrian

1 Like

I went to see Khera at Baylor, he charge me $250 just to see his face, few days before the appointment I sent him a email asking about PFS, he knew what my visit was about before hand, he replied me “Let’s discuss it in the appointment”.
I waste my money and my time.
Now whoever want to send a donation, can send a check directly to Khera at the end of the day he is the head of the study and he is going to receive that check with a big smile.

3 Likes

So donating to the foundation = donating to Khera even though alternative solutions were proposed?

Honestly, I’m tired of seeing your subliminal messages attacking awor and the foundation.

4 Likes

Pls refer to my cdnuts is a fraud thread regarding that topic.

2 Likes

I don’t support home brew at all, as I’ve stated many times in other threads. Also, I don’t blame the foundation, I think it’s the governments and the whole medical community to blame.

The problem is, I’ve already spent 11 years in this miserable state, seen countless doctors and tried all kinds of therapies, and I ran out of hope a long time ago.

I need renewed hope, which the research failed to deliver so far.

1 Like

I am not attacking anybody, I am just speaking the true, I am speaking what I believe to deserve to be told.
I didn’t mention the foundation, and I didn’t mention awor, I don’t know what you are talking about.
Donations will not work like that, it took an eternity to get the survey done for only 100 of us, make with your own conclusions.
If you want to shut my mouth or be silenced, it will not going to happen.
You don’t like me and I don’t like you neither, we better stop interchanging words, just ignore me, I will do the same with your post.

1 Like

You literally said donate to dr khera instead of the foundation

As if the avenues we are taking right now, have anything to do with a slow institutional process that we tried in the past.

You are taking subliminal attacks

Not, we are talking about donations not institutions, I just want to let the people know to the hand of what type of people the money goes.
I am not attacking the foundation definitely no.
The slow of the research and the slow of the survey it is out of the control of the foundation, everybody knows that.
And stop to pretend to be the knight of the foundation or a Hero because you are none.

I am 100% With You.

Yeah but if we don’t commit to research, what’s our alternative? If you’ve got a better alternative you’re more than free to share, but wouldn’t it be more prudent to put our money on research with the possibility of results rather than… just do absolutely nothing?

Maybe there’s a better way to go about research than the way that’s it’s being done currently, but for now, this is what we have and this is what we’ve gotta work with.

5 Likes

Like honestly guys, the big problem with PFS is that we literally don’t know what it is. We don’t know what exactly is wrong with our bodies, and trying to experiment with therapies at the moment is similar to doing surgery on a patient with no lights on and a garage toolbox instead of surgical instruments. It might work out, with divine intervention, or luck, or whatever you choose to believe in. But it can also break you depending on your state.

There are so many phenotypic variations (basically how the genetic/epigenetic situation exhibits itself in us) with PFS and it could get really bad.

That being said I do understand the frustration with having to wait, but maybe that’ll be easier if we commit towards coming up with a solution.

4 Likes

The alternative: Throw everything at the wall and see what sticks. I’ve been booed for pointing out that homebrew hasn’t offered a solution yet after thousands of “trials” over more than a decade’s time because no one wants to face reality.

@MOONCHILD, what did you expect Dr. Khera to say; that they totally found the root cause, explain it to you completely, and suggest a treatment? Not sure if you understand how unprofessional and risky that would be.

Ps- not to say that they found the root cause, only to clarify how absurd it would be to expect a medical researcher to reveal the results of a study to a patient before publication.

3 Likes

No money = No research, the foundation have limited amount of money or no money, we don’t have money and many of us not even a job.
Research require substantial amount of money that we don’t have and in many cases end in hand of wrong greedy researcher.

Yeah ok but what do we do instead?

Also it’s not right to say that in many cases end up in the hands of the “wrong greedy researcher”. Not every researcher is greedy, in fact, I’d say most aren’t. Because if money was what mattered to them more than anything, they’d probably pick a field besides academia. I do understand your concern though, but it’s just how life is, there will always be objectively shit people.

I am talking about his ethical, of knowing the reason of my appointment previously, knowing that he can’t do anything an encouraging me to discuss at the visit.
To discuss what ? Or he was missing my money ?

1 Like

I don’t know, but you have made your point a hundred times over that you are dissatisfied with your interaction with him and it is becoming redundant and unproductive. You are also doing so without his being present to defend himself. If you want to share your side of what happened in your member story or relevant category, go ahead. In any case you are attacking the character of one of the few people in a position to take action toward our benefit who has already spoken out about this condition in journal-published literature. It’s not going to continue.

5 Likes