Are recovery protocols REALLY recovery protocols?

Who is trying exactly same protocols? Like chis cdnuts ihatepropecias. Who did these enough time? Who recovered thanks to these protocols???

Very few people - if this was easy, we’d have found an answer by now, so please take part in and support the studies.

Davey is right.

My own understanding is that people adapt to PFS rather than cure it.

I know one guy who claims to be recovered also believe his hairloss has been ‘cured’.

I know friends, just double checking.

I think the major obstacle to any of these protocols being helpful is that the users (myself included) are being so inefficient about testing them. Examples of this inefficiency:

  1. People are not being really clear about what protocols they are testing, how long they are testing them, and then whether or not they felt it was of any benefit. I think some are quietly testing some aspect of a protocol without letting everyone know that it didn’t help them. In one thread, if even 5 members posted that they tried the protocol and it failed, that protocol could be effectively “retired” and we wouldn’t hear about it again.

  2. Inconsistency with how the protocols are being followed is really killing the efficiency. People are doing a methylation protocol, NO/NOx, nystatin, progesterone, chinese herbs, with a special diet…No useful evidence can be gained from this. What if some of that stuff interferes with each other? If you are better, how will you know what to attribute it to? For any of the 5 most popular protocols, think about how useful it would be if just 5 members agreed to do that protocol and that protocol only for like a month. By the end of that month we would know something useful. I understand completely that it is because we are also so desperate to recover that everyone wants to try everything.

Let’s pretend for a second that a cure, or at least some protocol that can get us as close to normal as possible, can be found through this website. We will never find it without a more systematic approach than what we are doing now.