Thanks, @axolotl . I read the full paper, and following are some quotes, which caught my attention:
-
Presently it is impossible to establish whether the SRD5A2 methylation pattern in PFS patients is set during early embryo development or results from finasteride treatment itself.
-
A possible hypothesis for the persistent side effects may be epigenetic modifications occurring in PFS patients
-
…demonstrating a tissue-specific epigenetic gene silencing
-
The reason for the persistence of PFS symptoms even long after drug withdrawal in PFS patients remains a mystery.
-
These results, however, must be interpreted with extreme caution, given the low number of subjects analysed
-
Whether the sexual and psychiatric symptoms documented in these patients are related to methylation of SRD5A2 cannot be concluded by this study, as no significant differences could be demonstrated
Roberto Melcangi is clearly telling us to not read too much into these results. As he states, these results do not directly explain anything, let along point to a root cause. So let’s all refrain from interpretations, which the author of this paper does not support.
Having said this, I find the results where many patients have SRD5A2 methylation intriguing. Though, I am looking at this from a completely different angle, than what RM was hypothesizing.
DNA methylation plays an important role in regulating gene expression (of any genes, not just SRD5A2). Aberrant DNA methylation is a feature of a number of important human diseases. The addition of methyl groups is controlled at several different levels in cells and is carried out by a family of enzymes called DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs).
Since a while, I am suspecting that perhaps a mutation at the DNMT level and/or methyl donor excess could be involved in this, in the sense that we are more sensitive to epigenetic modifications triggered by endocrine disrupting substances, than your average person would be.
This could explain the persistent overexpression of the AR, which was found in PFS patients examined in the 2014 Di Loreto study. Such a hypothesis makes a lot of sense to me, with deregulated neurosteroids, 5ar, gut microbiota, etc. as a downstream effects. It is hypothesized, that persistent AR overexpression is also caused by epigenetic modifications at some level.
AR overexpression can comprehensively explain our symptoms, while the purely CNS focused view of RM cannot. Perhaps that is why he is largely ignoring the vast physical symptom profile outside of nervous system related effects, which I don’t really consider good science. Even if he cannot explain them, RM could at least acknowledge their existence. By not doing so, he unfortunately is cementing an incomplete impression of what PFS is, and is thereby doing us a disservice. Having said this, I appreciate the work he has been doing regarding PFS, even if I do not agree with his narrow approach and many of his views.
In summary, this paper gives us further clues of where to continue looking. By this I don’t mean more focus on the brain, but rather on epigenetics and the methyl system, mainly also outside of the brain.
Note: These days, whenever I mention PFS, I am always referring to the bigger picture of PSSD, PAS, etc. I consider these to be the same problem, until proven otherwise.