4th Examiner Article by John Peige about Propecia

examiner.com/courts-in-baltimore/safety-debate-intensifies-over-propecia

This guy is hammering away.

Using this to create a snowball effect

I sent this to the Las Vegas Review Journal. Please write to them too if you can.
reviewjournal.com/about/print/press/news.html A phone call might be better: 702-383-0264


[b]The Shocking and PERMANENT side effects of hair loss drug Propecia is creating a national sensation. LVRJ Should join in on the topic!

examiner.com/courts-in-baltimore/safety-debate-intensifies-over-propecia

examiner.com/courts-in-baltimore/more-men-say-lives-are-ruined-as-word-spreads-on-propecia-s-side-effects

examiner.com/courts-in-baltimore/doctors-link-hair-growth-drug-to-sexual-dysfunction-depression-and-cancer

examiner.com/courts-in-baltimore/merck-pulls-propecia-website-content-from-internet-as-public-concern-deepens[/b]

Thats a good idea, think I will use that tactic too

That guy must know someone who took propecia and is experiencing side effects. Maybe his son or nephew or something.

AND ANOTHER!

examiner.com/courts-in-baltimore/buy-cheap-propecia-websites-flourish-as-lawsuits-mount

This disclaimer appeared under his latest piece –

“Disclaimer: The author is the communications director for a Baltimore-based law firm and has written about a number of diverse legal subjects for the Examiner. He is not involved with any Propecia litigation. His interest in this topic comes as a former longtime Propecia patient who has first-hand knowledge of the permanence of the drug’s severe side effects after discontinuation of its use.
Continue reading on Examiner.com FDA reviewing safety of Propecia - Baltimore Courts | Examiner.com examiner.com/courts-in-baltimore/safety-of-hair-growth-drug-propecia-under-fda-review#ixzz1nyDFEPJ4

It appears he’s fellow sufferer.

Ahh, that explains his serious interest in the cause. I wonder if he’s a member here.

Latest piece.

Many questions, few answers as FDA conducts safety review of Propecia

examiner.com/courts-in-baltimore/many-questions-few-answers-as-fda-conducts-safety-review-of-propecia

Awesome. I am glad he is raising awareness of this dangerous drug.

Just so he knows: it’s= it is or it has. Its = gender neutral possesive pronoun

Perhaps you should email grammar nitpicks to him directly [sarc]. Given the cognitive problems that finasteride inflicts let’s just be glad he’s writing the stories.

Point of fact: the website has been down since at least October 2011 - 5 months prior to the writing of this article.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=5672

Latest piece:

FDA widens Propecia safety probe

examiner.com/courts-in-baltimore/fda-widens-propecia-safety-probe

And another:

examiner.com/courts-in-baltimore/fda-and-merck-remain-silent-on-propecia-safety-while-adverseevents-speaks-out

Can people please write to Richard Horton at The Lancet and to Dr. David Graham at the FDA.

Dr. David Graham testified against Merck regarding Vioxx and I think is a good guy to contact about this problem.

Has the forum heard of this two week old piece?

examiner.com/courts-in-baltimore/new-research-finds-finasteride-propecia-causes-penile-shrinkage-rats

examiner.com/article/propecia-victims-furious-bosley-knew-of-drug-s-dangers-but-did-not-warn-patients