I haven’t had time to fully read and respond to all the comments here but I will soon.
Just need to vent quick because the Tressless guys are saying I’m either a:
- Troll
- Schizophrenic
I find it very frustrating, but I’m done engaging with them for now.
It’s entirely possible some here are mentally unstable, delusional and / or psychotic. Some may also be experiencing “symptoms” from the nocebo effect. BUT, that doesn’t mean it’s the case for ALL of us or even most of us.
I know that first night it was like a switch… substantial decrease in sensitivity, followed by other physical changes.
They say none of our experiences are physically possible and that the ONLY answer is psychology.
They argue that DHT is only meaningful in adolescence and has no effect on physical sex organs as an adult.
That MAY well be true… BUT, they forget that a decrease in DHT causes an increase in free T which is aromatized to estrogen… low inter-testicular T can cause atrophy and raised estrogen levels can lead to gyno.
They forget that while blocking 5ar primarily functions to reduce DHT, it also messes with other neurochemicals…
Generally, they only focus on the part of the mechanistic model relevant to them and ignore the rest.
They also argue that this can’t be possible because there would be thousands of doctors saying not to take it… but my OWN GP did say not to take it because it could cause “chemical castration”.
They argue it would have been seen in initial trials, BUT the experimental design suffered several flaws:
The lack of data collected after cessation. The type of data collected. Dosage pattern limitations… like those who stopped and then started again etc.
The limited sample size… yes it was a massive sample… but if you take 100k people and track them for 3 months, and observe that nobody gets struck by lightning, it would be foolish to conclude humans cannot be struck by lightning.
That’s what’s happening here… it’s called a sampling error.
The large number of homogenous anecdotes and reasonable mechanistic explanation paint a compelling picture.
I don’t understand why it’s so rare or why otherwise healthy individuals like myself respond negatively. I’ve never had strong, masculine secondary sex characteristics, and I wonder if that’s a potential indicator of androgen level / receptor abnormality.
Either way, their relentless resolve is making me question my own reality. I find it distressing, and I need to stop engaging for my own sanity.
I can easily tell my testicles have decreased in size. TMI, but rubbing the tip used to be super ticklish, now I barely feel it. Gyno is subtle, but noticeable.
If it was mental why did it take 5 months on the drug for me to experience these things?
I’m torn because I don’t understand why this happened to us, but not SO many other men.
For me, I think I may have been fine had I just stayed on the drug. I stopped because my dosage ran out and I needed to wait 5 days for the refill. Then sides hit hard.
So… those guys romanticize the idea of large scale clinical trials. They are still limited, and they don’t paint the whole picture. The 2% with sides represent uncertainty in their model.
Regardless, the opportunity for a person to misreport subjective experience is the SAME in and out of an organized clinical trial… so why should our accounts be discounted?
I want my hair back, I want the sides to go away, and now, I want to stop feeling like I might be crazy…
I even found a paper written by a medical doctor stating the only explanation is the rare occurrence of group delusion.
A large scale trial based on subjective experience is still just a collection of anecdotes…
Anyways…
I understand it’s a waste of my time. But I actually thought I might be able to help some people.
It may not matter though… it’s like telling people not to take a walk because they might be struck by lightning.
Apparently it’s incredibly rare and we’re just the unlucky bastards left to deal with it.
I really appreciate the positive comments though guys. I’m glad we have a support group for this.
<3