Back to the basics

General Discussion
#21

Mew definitely there is no reason to think that discussions should detract from the studies, I can’t see how, particularly that the forum is giving due priorities, publicity and emphasis wise, on the studies.

As I said I was one of those who did not qualify for the trials. But even if I am participating I would still be interested in discussing things here.

I understand the studies had low take up, I wonder why that is the case and whether we can do something about it. Approach each member and ask them to make the call and tell them we are ready to compensate…

#22

From wikipedia

Italian study shows we have altered neuroactive steroids, so this may cause androgen upregulation.

Root cause may lay on neuroactive steroids…

#23

I agree with Mew and mcibofh.

People have tossed around theories on the forum for years with 0% returns. Now some members are proposing to increase the amount of time wasted. Are you unable to learn lessons from what has already happened?

The areas where we can exert influence are, in no specific order:

  • Raising funds to donate to the PFS Foundation
  • If you can’t afford to donate, working on increasing your income so that you become able to donate
  • Working on media awareness projects/PR
  • If you are not aware of PR techniques then look at blogs or read a book on the subject until you can assist
  • Participating in studies
  • Encouraging others to participate in studies
  • Raising awareness that there are open studies waiting for participants

These are vitally important areas. If we invested the same amount of time into these areas instead of pointless theorising, we would get significantly better returns.

The map which nopecia made was a good idea and interesting to look at, seems like it would be a good PR tool.

#24

Thanks. I think I’ll add it to my signature. According to my stats it’s only had 68 visits, so it’s certainly underused considering how powerful it is.